Have You Seen The World? Travel Β· Places Β· Experiences
Travel editorial workspace with map, camera and notebook
Editorial Policy

How we choose, verify, organize and update travel content.

Have You Seen The World? is built to help readers discover places and make better travel decisions. This Editorial Policy explains the standards we use when selecting topics, evaluating sources, presenting practical information, correcting mistakes and separating editorial content from commercial relationships.

Our editorial standard

Useful, clear and connected with the real trip.

πŸ”Ž

Verify important facts

Time-sensitive practical details should be checked against reliable and, where possible, official sources.

🧭

Write for decisions

Content should help readers decide where to go, what to prioritize and how a place fits into the wider trip.

πŸ”„

Correct and update

Travel information changes. Material errors and meaningful outdated details should be reviewed and corrected.

🀝

Separate commercial influence

Sponsored or commercial relationships should be disclosed and should not determine editorial conclusions.

1. Purpose of the policy

Why we publish an Editorial Policy.

The purpose of this policy is to explain the editorial principles behind HaveYouSeenTheWorld.com and to give readers a clear framework for understanding how travel content is selected, prepared, checked, maintained and corrected.

The site covers destinations, cities, attractions, nature, museums, food, experiences, itineraries, accommodation and practical travel topics. Different kinds of articles require different levels of verification, but the same basic principle applies: content should be useful to a real traveler, not simply exist to fill a page.

Travel information can change quickly. Opening hours, ticket systems, transport schedules, access rules, prices and local restrictions should always be treated as time-sensitive.

2. Topic selection

How topics are chosen.

Topics are selected according to their usefulness for travelers and their relevance to the structure of the site. We may prioritize:

  • destinations and cities with clear travel demand or strong editorial value;
  • attractions and places that help explain a destination;
  • nature, food and experiences that add depth beyond the most obvious landmarks;
  • practical questions travelers regularly need to solve;
  • routes and itineraries where geography, transport and pacing matter;
  • topics that strengthen an existing destination or thematic guide rather than unnecessarily duplicate it.

Popularity can be a useful signal, but it is not the only one. Smaller destinations, lesser-known attractions and local experiences may be covered when they offer genuine value or create a more complete picture of a place.

3. Sources & research

Which sources are preferred?

The reliability needed from a source depends on the claim being made. Practical facts that can materially affect a trip should be supported by stronger and more current sources than general inspiration or background context.

Official sources Official attraction websites, national park authorities, transport operators, tourism boards, public authorities, museums and other first-party sources are preferred for operational details.
Primary documentation Rules, timetables, booking systems, official notices, public documents and direct service information may be used where they are the most authoritative source.
Established secondary sources Reputable publications, specialist references and established travel resources may be used for context, comparisons and information not available directly from an official source.
Local and community context Local publications and community discussions may help identify practical realities or emerging issues, but anecdotal information should not be presented as confirmed fact without appropriate verification.

When sources conflict, preference is generally given to the source with the strongest authority over the specific fact, provided it is current. A recent official timetable, for example, is more relevant than an older third-party summary.

4. Accuracy & practical information

What we try to verify most carefully.

Particular care is given to information that can directly affect whether a traveler can access, book, reach or safely use a place or service.

  • opening days and hours;
  • ticketing and reservation requirements;
  • access restrictions and seasonal closures;
  • transport connections and route information;
  • location and practical access details;
  • material costs where price information is central to the article;
  • official safety or regulatory information;
  • material changes that make older travel advice misleading.

We avoid presenting estimates, opinions or third-party claims as confirmed facts. When information is uncertain, changing or dependent on season or personal circumstances, the wording should make that uncertainty clear.

Readers should verify critical time-sensitive details directly with the relevant operator or authority before travel, especially when a booking, border rule, transport connection or restricted access depends on it.

5. Reviews, rankings & recommendations

Recommendations should have a reason behind them.

When the site recommends a place, route, hotel type, experience or travel option, the recommendation should be based on relevant factors rather than unsupported superlatives.

Depending on the topic, those factors may include location, accessibility, uniqueness, practical value, scenery, cultural importance, suitability for a particular trip style, route efficiency or the strength of the experience.

Rankings

Rankings or β€œbest” lists should only be used where there is a meaningful basis for comparison. A ranking should not imply objective precision when the subject is inherently subjective.

Personal preference

Where a statement is primarily editorial judgment, preference or interpretation, it should be distinguishable from a factual claim.

6. Updates & freshness

Travel content is not permanently finished.

Published articles may be reviewed and updated when important information changes, when a destination develops, when a better source becomes available or when an article can be made materially more useful.

Not every change to a page requires a public correction note. Routine improvements may include:

  • refreshing practical details;
  • clarifying wording;
  • adding new internal links or related destinations;
  • improving structure or navigation;
  • replacing outdated recommendations;
  • adding new context to keep the guide useful.

Material factual corrections are handled separately under the corrections policy below.

7. Corrections policy

What happens when something is wrong?

Readers, businesses, organizations and other interested parties can report a possible factual error by contacting contact@haveyouseentheworld.com.

1 Report

Send the article or page and clearly identify the information that may be incorrect.

2 Review

The claim is checked against appropriate sources and the context in which it appears.

3 Correct

If the information is materially wrong or outdated, the article is amended.

4 Clarify when needed

A correction note may be added when the original error was significant enough to warrant one.

Requests to change accurate information solely because it is unfavorable or commercially inconvenient are not treated as factual corrections.

8. Sponsored & commercial content

Commercial relationships must not be disguised as ordinary editorial content.

Have You Seen The World? may in the future publish sponsored content, partnerships or other commercial material. When content is created or published as part of a paid commercial relationship, that relationship should be disclosed in a clear way appropriate to the format.

Editorial Independent articles

Ordinary editorial content is selected and developed according to the site’s editorial priorities. A business does not receive favorable editorial conclusions simply because it advertises or cooperates with the site.

Commercial Sponsored relationships

Paid or sponsored cooperation should be disclosed. Commercial involvement should not be presented in a way that causes readers to mistake advertising for independent editorial judgment.

9. Affiliate links

Affiliate relationships, if used, should be transparent.

Some pages may in the future contain affiliate links. If a reader follows such a link and makes a purchase or booking, Have You Seen The World? may receive a commission without increasing the price paid by the reader, depending on the partner’s terms.

The existence or size of an affiliate commission should not determine whether a destination, attraction, hotel or service is recommended. Where affiliate links are used, an appropriate disclosure should be provided.

10. Images, maps & other media

Visual material should support the article without misleading the reader.

Images, illustrations, maps and other media should be used lawfully and in a way that reflects the subject accurately. Where attribution or licensing conditions apply, they should be respected.

Illustrative visuals should not be presented as documentary evidence of a specific current condition when they are not. A scenic image can represent a destination, but it should not be used to imply that a temporary situation, facility or view is guaranteed to look exactly the same during every visit.

11. Responsible travel

Useful travel advice should also consider the place being visited.

Have You Seen The World? aims to avoid encouraging behavior that is clearly unsafe, unlawful, environmentally destructive or disrespectful to local communities, protected areas or cultural sites.

Where relevant, travel content may highlight:

  • official access rules and protected-area restrictions;
  • seasonal or environmental limitations;
  • respectful behavior in sacred, cultural or residential places;
  • the need to follow local wildlife and conservation rules;
  • the practical impact of overcrowding or fragile environments.

Responsible travel does not require turning every guide into a lecture. It means giving readers enough context to avoid obvious harm or serious misunderstandings.

12. Reader submissions & external suggestions

Suggestions are welcome, but they do not guarantee publication.

Readers, tourism organizations, attractions, accommodation providers and other parties may suggest corrections, destinations, topics or cooperation ideas.

A suggestion does not create an obligation to publish, update or recommend a place. Editorial decisions remain based on relevance, usefulness, available evidence and the priorities of the portal.

Submitted factual information may be independently checked before it is incorporated into an article.

13. Editorial independence

The reader’s usefulness comes before a partner’s preferred wording.

Commercial partners, tourism organizations, businesses and other external parties may provide information, access or materials, but they do not automatically control the editorial conclusions of independent articles.

Where an external party has materially influenced or sponsored the content itself, that relationship should be disclosed rather than presented as fully independent editorial coverage.

We do not promise positive coverage in exchange for access, products, accommodation, services or payment.

14. Contacting the editorial team

Corrections, questions and editorial enquiries.

For a correction, source question, destination suggestion or editorial enquiry, contact: contact@haveyouseentheworld.com.

For corrections, please include the relevant article or page and explain which statement should be reviewed. Providing an official or otherwise reliable source can make the review faster.

General contact information is also available on the Contact page.

15. Changes to this policy

The Editorial Policy may evolve with the site.

This policy may be updated as Have You Seen The World? develops new content formats, commercial relationships, editorial workflows or correction procedures.

The current version will be published on this page.

Last updated: 4 September 2026

What this means in practice

Good travel content should make the reader more informed, not just more excited.

Inspiration matters, but usefulness depends on accuracy, context and knowing where a recommendation stops being a fact.

πŸ“

Place first

Every article should remain connected with the destination, route or experience it is actually about.

πŸ”Ž

Strong sources for strong claims

The more a fact can affect a real trip, the more important current and authoritative sourcing becomes.

βš–οΈ

Fact and judgment are different

Readers should be able to distinguish practical information from editorial preference or interpretation.

πŸ”„

Update when it matters

Changed access, transport or practical details deserve more attention than cosmetic edits.

🀝

Disclose commercial influence

Readers should know when a commercial relationship materially affects how content came to exist.

🌍

Respect the destination

Travel advice should not encourage obvious harm to local communities, protected places or wildlife.

Found something that needs review?

Send the page and the detail that should be checked.

Corrections, source questions and editorial enquiries can be sent to contact@haveyouseentheworld.com.

Scroll to Top